ext_90803 ([identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2010-12-13 09:47 pm (UTC)

Probably not, because the arguments for the mandate are based in Congressional powers that don't actually apply in this case. The states are free to mandate in this instance, as they do in Massachusetts with no Constitutional issue.
(156 comments)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of people who comment anonymously.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.