http://yes-justice.livejournal.com/ (
yes-justice.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
talkpolitics
2010-11-20 08:28 am (UTC)
Re: And speaking of fossil fueled based anti-global warming links....
why did it take them 5 years to come up with an argument?
AIRS launched in 2002, they collected data from 2003 on and published some findings in 2008. Why is this suspect?
Could it be that the AGW thing was going so well they simply didn't see a need before then?
So, NASA launched AIRS to satisfy this conspiracy theory?
The government doesn't support scientists with the other view.
Richard Lindzen's work at MIT and with the National Academy of Sciences was all government funded.
(
217 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
(will be screened if not validated)
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
Re: And speaking of fossil fueled based anti-global warming links....
AIRS launched in 2002, they collected data from 2003 on and published some findings in 2008. Why is this suspect?
Could it be that the AGW thing was going so well they simply didn't see a need before then?
So, NASA launched AIRS to satisfy this conspiracy theory?
The government doesn't support scientists with the other view.
Richard Lindzen's work at MIT and with the National Academy of Sciences was all government funded.