The other thing is, that physicist he linked to, resigning in a big huff over the global warming hoax? Nearly none of the participants in that body of scientists receive a dime of gov't money for their work. And that's easily verified by looking up grants etc, since it's all public.
The other link about a lack of scientific agreement, was written by a gentleman who works for a right wing think tank mostly funded by fossil fuel industries. Never mind the game being played, the argument moved from any scientific papers arguing over agreement as a whole about global warming, to just random polls. So you're seeing terms being mixed up and really confusing the situation in the public mind.
You know, I can bet you this week's paycheck, I can find a doctor that will tell you cancer isn't caused by smoking cigarettes. Oh wait, the tobbaco lobby tried that route in the 1960s and 1970s and 1980s and 1990s.
no subject
The other link about a lack of scientific agreement, was written by a gentleman who works for a right wing think tank mostly funded by fossil fuel industries. Never mind the game being played, the argument moved from any scientific papers arguing over agreement as a whole about global warming, to just random polls. So you're seeing terms being mixed up and really confusing the situation in the public mind.
You know, I can bet you this week's paycheck, I can find a doctor that will tell you cancer isn't caused by smoking cigarettes. Oh wait, the tobbaco lobby tried that route in the 1960s and 1970s and 1980s and 1990s.