ext_114905 ([identity profile] mijopo.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2010-07-08 02:14 pm (UTC)

Sex is actually integral to sexual abuse, otherwise it wouldn't be sexual abuse. Why don't you tell a sexual abuse victim whose ability to enjoy or engage in sex has been severely affected by their abuse that the sex was largely incidental?

Of course you can have sex without abuse and you can cut someone open without it being an assault, but that doesn't make the sex or the cutting open any less traumatic when it is in fact associated with abuse or assault.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting