http://eracerhead.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] eracerhead.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2010-06-23 01:05 pm (UTC)

You know, as a voter and as someone who has been around a few years. I have heard the argument that 'we just need more troops' before. In fact, I heard that all through the sixties and early seventies. Generals always want more troops, it is up to civilians to keep them in check.

Troops are not pawns in a chess game, but are actual people with actual families who actually mourn the loss of loved ones. This is why much of the American public has a distaste for war and why we don't want to prolong it.

We need more troops to win? Win what? What is the metric, break the back of the Taliban? Get real. What have we 'won' in Iraq? How much of a threat is Vietnam since we pulled out with our tail between our legs?

This is just deja-vu all over again.





Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting