bs: all this time I thought you would be one to equate education and income.
Why?
bs: In fact, if I were a betting man, I'd bet I can go back in your comments and show where you equate just that.
I'd be curious to see where you believe I've said that. Certainly I believe graduating from high school and college ups your chances of getting a good job, but I've known plenty of people with advanced degrees who live modestly, and plenty of people who stopped at getting a Bachelor's who pull in high incomes.
bs: Obviously, discriminating on someone misspelling a word is being classist!
Where have I said that?
bs: I guess paper is a "good" indication of income, but education isn't?
A high level of education is an indication that either your parents had money, or you at one time had enough to pay for that education. The quality of paper you use for a resume is more likely to indicate your present ability to pay for expensive paper.
Do you understand the difference?
JS: And I enjoy how you say poor education "or carelessness". Careful not to use too many synonyms of "oversight" or else you might contradict yourself. Ooops, too late. (see below)
Where do you imagine I'm contradicting myself?
BS: And how come choosing the wrong paper is a lack of income and not carelessness?
I'm sure it can be. It can also be an indication of someone not having a lot of money to spare. It's not an indication of carelessness or poor education akin to bad spelling.
Kind of like a poor credit rating can indicate either irresponsibility when it comes to money -- or bad luck, as in a serious illness or a layoff in hard economic times.
bs: They're bother oversights and errors, no? p: No. bs: Please read your first sentence in the response directly above this for massive LULz
Sorry, but I don't see the "LULz." As I said, I don't consider the use of inexpensive paper the equivalent of a poorly spelled resume.
no subject
Why?
bs: In fact, if I were a betting man, I'd bet I can go back in your comments and show where you equate just that.
I'd be curious to see where you believe I've said that. Certainly I believe graduating from high school and college ups your chances of getting a good job, but I've known plenty of people with advanced degrees who live modestly, and plenty of people who stopped at getting a Bachelor's who pull in high incomes.
bs: Obviously, discriminating on someone misspelling a word is being classist!
Where have I said that?
bs: I guess paper is a "good" indication of income, but education isn't?
A high level of education is an indication that either your parents had money, or you at one time had enough to pay for that education. The quality of paper you use for a resume is more likely to indicate your present ability to pay for expensive paper.
Do you understand the difference?
JS: And I enjoy how you say poor education "or carelessness". Careful not to use too many synonyms of "oversight" or else you might contradict yourself. Ooops, too late. (see below)
Where do you imagine I'm contradicting myself?
BS: And how come choosing the wrong paper is a lack of income and not carelessness?
I'm sure it can be. It can also be an indication of someone not having a lot of money to spare. It's not an indication of carelessness or poor education akin to bad spelling.
Kind of like a poor credit rating can indicate either irresponsibility when it comes to money -- or bad luck, as in a serious illness or a layoff in hard economic times.
bs: They're bother oversights and errors, no?
p: No.
bs: Please read your first sentence in the response directly above this for massive LULz
Sorry, but I don't see the "LULz." As I said, I don't consider the use of inexpensive paper the equivalent of a poorly spelled resume.