ext_306469 (
paft.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
talkpolitics
2010-05-18 05:37 am (UTC)
no subject
"Covering bases?" Are you kidding?
Confessing to something they didn't do and promising to return something they didn't have wouldn't just be "stupid." It would be insane. Do you really consider that more likely than the most obvious explanation?
(
196 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
(will be screened if not validated)
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
Confessing to something they didn't do and promising to return something they didn't have wouldn't just be "stupid." It would be insane. Do you really consider that more likely than the most obvious explanation?