I already addressed his points and the flaws witht them and even gave you the links to those discussions.
If you want to pretend nothing else has been said and everything is only ad hominems, then that is your choice but honestly I dont have time for it.
I even asked you which points you felt I had ignored, and after asking twice I still get .... nothing...specifying which points he made that I ignored.
So until you list which post I apparently ignored, or list which points I didnt address in some way -- then I'm not interested in this. As I said before, if you can't point out what I didnt answer then I consider this as wank and am not interested.
Re: Ad homi-what?
If you want to pretend nothing else has been said and everything is only ad hominems, then that is your choice but honestly I dont have time for it.
I even asked you which points you felt I had ignored, and after asking twice I still get .... nothing...specifying which points he made that I ignored.
So until you list which post I apparently ignored, or list which points I didnt address in some way -- then I'm not interested in this. As I said before, if you can't point out what I didnt answer then I consider this as wank and am not interested.