Well, I've already pointed out numerous holes in rasilio's argument and furthermore sealwhiskers has shot several holes in it as wekk -- it seemed his response had already been addressed.

But I thought you were trying to continue Deb's "argument" which is why I said I wasn't interested.

and I never pretended I was profound, rather I've argued that the problems with rasilio's assumptions were so obvious it was profound that they weren't seen.

But if you want me to beat up his response again -- fine, I'll do that in a little bit after I get some work done.