ext_90803 (
badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
talkpolitics
2010-05-01 08:24 pm (UTC)
no subject
And when did all this happen?
Over the last 60 years, mostly due to liberal politicians.
Military is government spending too.
But it's not the lion's share, and is Constitutional.
So what constitutes "reasonable suspicion"?
We'd use the test from
Terry
.
You don't see how this gives a police officer the right (if not the requirement) to pull anyone over for "appearing" to be illegal?
I know it doesn't, because the law specifically limits it to lawful contact.
And what criteria would be used to determine this?
Whether they can produce proof of citizenship or legal status. That includes a license in Arizona.
(
55 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
(will be screened if not validated)
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
Over the last 60 years, mostly due to liberal politicians.
Military is government spending too.
But it's not the lion's share, and is Constitutional.
So what constitutes "reasonable suspicion"?
We'd use the test from Terry.
You don't see how this gives a police officer the right (if not the requirement) to pull anyone over for "appearing" to be illegal?
I know it doesn't, because the law specifically limits it to lawful contact.
And what criteria would be used to determine this?
Whether they can produce proof of citizenship or legal status. That includes a license in Arizona.