Growth, expansion, and promoting of unions, high regulatory costs, high corporate taxes. And when did all this happen?
No, like raising taxes to promote offshoring and tax havens. Once again, when did this happen?
Clearly no, but the result of liberal policies always end up with more institutional spending. Military is government spending too.
It's not, but no one's looking to enact a law for "illegal searches," just one that checks the citizenship status of already-in-trouble people. The broad guidelines of this law say otherwise, and I'm sure the Supreme Court will disagree with you as well. To quote the actual law:
A PEACE OFFICER MAY LAWFULLY STOP ANY PERSON WHO IS OPERATING A MOTOR VEHICLE IF THE OFFICER HAS REASONABLE SUSPICION TO BELIEVE THE PERSON IS IN VIOLATION OF ANY CIVIL TRAFFIC LAW AND THIS SECTION
So what constitutes "reasonable suspicion"? You don't see how this gives a police officer the right (if not the requirement) to pull anyone over for "appearing" to be illegal? And what criteria would be used to determine this?
no subject
And when did all this happen?
No, like raising taxes to promote offshoring and tax havens.
Once again, when did this happen?
Clearly no, but the result of liberal policies always end up with more institutional spending.
Military is government spending too.
It's not, but no one's looking to enact a law for "illegal searches," just one that checks the citizenship status of already-in-trouble people.
The broad guidelines of this law say otherwise, and I'm sure the Supreme Court will disagree with you as well. To quote the actual law:
A PEACE OFFICER MAY LAWFULLY STOP ANY PERSON WHO IS OPERATING A MOTOR VEHICLE IF THE OFFICER HAS REASONABLE SUSPICION TO BELIEVE THE PERSON IS IN VIOLATION OF ANY CIVIL TRAFFIC LAW AND THIS SECTION
So what constitutes "reasonable suspicion"? You don't see how this gives a police officer the right (if not the requirement) to pull anyone over for "appearing" to be illegal? And what criteria would be used to determine this?