1. The first pic, saying it is AK-47. Given the quality of the image, it can be anything including the Fox Run kitchenware. The way it is presented - "it almost definitely is" speaks of itself - remove this tag, nobody knows wtf was that.
2. The second pic, labeled as RPG-7. RPG-7 is 15 lbs gear, you can't handle it like shown. You take it by the handle or in the balanced middlepoit, you don't wave it like iron club. Fortunately, we have a video, not still here and you can compare WYS with WYG 'normal' dynamics of carrying a heavy weapon.
Now. You point out that a fight is taking place in close nearby. I personally find it strange that who is announced as armed insurgents are not taking part in it, but just mind their own business, hanging around, chatting with the reporters, giving interviews, taking no care of GIs proximity and showing no single sign of alert.
I ask myself - why, if they come to insurge, why bother with the reporters, if the come to pose for photo why this dangerous zone was chosen for it. I see it as they're just locals belonging to this place interacting with the reporters in what they think is out-of-fire area.
It's not that I'm taking this or that side, I'm just pointing you to the weak points in your arguments, FOC.
"propaganda-dot-com" (c)
1. The first pic, saying it is AK-47. Given the quality of the image, it can be anything including the Fox Run kitchenware. The way it is presented - "it almost definitely is" speaks of itself - remove this tag, nobody knows wtf was that.
2. The second pic, labeled as RPG-7. RPG-7 is 15 lbs gear, you can't handle it like shown. You take it by the handle or in the balanced middlepoit, you don't wave it like iron club. Fortunately, we have a video, not still here and you can compare WYS with WYG 'normal' dynamics of carrying a heavy weapon.
Now. You point out that a fight is taking place in close nearby.
I personally find it strange that who is announced as armed insurgents are not taking part in it, but just mind their own business, hanging around, chatting with the reporters, giving interviews, taking no care of GIs proximity and showing no single sign of alert.
I ask myself - why, if they come to insurge, why bother with the reporters, if the come to pose for photo why this dangerous zone was chosen for it.
I see it as they're just locals belonging to this place interacting with the reporters in what they think is out-of-fire area.
It's not that I'm taking this or that side, I'm just pointing you to the weak points in your arguments, FOC.