The judges aren't being racist in their sentencing they are following the law.
You have poor reading comprehension. Please, read my post again. The issue of judges (possibly) being racist is not related to the mandatory sentencing disparity between crack and cocaine.
Both of your responses to this post have been wrong because you misread what I wrote or what an article was saying. It'd be nice if you would acknowledge that-- We all make mistakes but I feel as though you are jumping to (wrong) conclusions about the things that I post. That makes your responses seems a little hasty and unthoughtful.
To move past this I was wondering if you know if there are any data to support the common notion that "Crack is more addictive than coke?" it might be, but I wonder how one might measure that. Everyone say that "Crack is more addictive than coke" but what is this based on?
Re: 35 lines a day! (The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986)
You have poor reading comprehension. Please, read my post again. The issue of judges (possibly) being racist is not related to the mandatory sentencing disparity between crack and cocaine.
Both of your responses to this post have been wrong because you misread what I wrote or what an article was saying. It'd be nice if you would acknowledge that-- We all make mistakes but I feel as though you are jumping to (wrong) conclusions about the things that I post. That makes your responses seems a little hasty and unthoughtful.
To move past this I was wondering if you know if there are any data to support the common notion that "Crack is more addictive than coke?" it might be, but I wonder how one might measure that. Everyone say that "Crack is more addictive than coke" but what is this based on?