ext_97971 ([identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2009-12-10 07:15 pm (UTC)

Notice how I said all four criteria must be present and you only complained about two.

Not to mention: yes, tampering with evidence is possible and it can be planted; are we to then assume that all evidence is planted? Are we going to remove the element of trust we have in our police? Is DNA+video survellience evidence going to be discounted because it could be tampered with?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting