Look, I consider myself a conservative of a kind and Medicare for all, or a National Health Service/Welfare System seems to me to be part of the basis for a modern, civilised society.
It doesn't change other things, but it does bring health within the ægis of civil service/governmental departments, and that governance is therefore subject to voters, not shareholders. (I am making a distinction here which may not be obvious to everyone, even though you and others will assume this.) Structurally it assumes the health of the nation and its constituents are a vital part of the infrastructure of the nation. This is definitely true in wartime, why not in peacetime?
no subject
It doesn't change other things, but it does bring health within the ægis of civil service/governmental departments, and that governance is therefore subject to voters, not shareholders. (I am making a distinction here which may not be obvious to everyone, even though you and others will assume this.) Structurally it assumes the health of the nation and its constituents are a vital part of the infrastructure of the nation. This is definitely true in wartime, why not in peacetime?