The fault seems to be right there in the headline 'patronizing' and assuming that black people are literally dumber than they are because they're black. That was the conclusion I got in reading the article.
And the reflexive backlash against it from white American liberals who wrote long screeds about how they never had a racist thought in their entire lives and those damned CENSORED should have been grateful for it went a long way to validate its assumptions.
no subject
And the reflexive backlash against it from white American liberals who wrote long screeds about how they never had a racist thought in their entire lives and those damned CENSORED should have been grateful for it went a long way to validate its assumptions.