ext_370466 ([identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2015-08-25 01:16 am (UTC)

Hindsight being 20/20, the physics and design work was quite sound, and would have probably worked fine had the Space Shuttle come in on budget. Problem was, as it is with the current missile defense system, that counter-measures are way cheaper than the system.

If your multi-billion dollar super weapon can be neutralized by a five thousand dollar decoy balloon why spend the money on the super weapon?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting