This isn't about "whom they'd bang", it's about who gets government benefits and tax incentives for banging who. That's a responsibility not a liberty.
Likewise the libertarian / tea-party wing of the GOP has been more supportive of Gay Rights (http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/30/slate-wonders-why-libertarian-party-insi) for longer than many Democrats (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/flashback-watch-hillary-clinton-defend-heterosexual-marriage-as-a-fundamental-bedrock-principle/article/2563454)
no subject
This isn't about "whom they'd bang", it's about who gets government benefits and tax incentives for banging who. That's a responsibility not a liberty.
Likewise the libertarian / tea-party wing of the GOP has been more supportive of Gay Rights (http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/30/slate-wonders-why-libertarian-party-insi) for longer than many Democrats (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/flashback-watch-hillary-clinton-defend-heterosexual-marriage-as-a-fundamental-bedrock-principle/article/2563454)