I'm glad that you agree with Paft's OP then, since it was about rhetoric influencing potentially violent actions.

Oh, don't get confused here. The OP's entire premise isn't supported by the evidence, which is a wholly separate issue than what showing up at Occupy protests might entail.

Well, not regarding Jerad Miller.

Which is funny since that's exactly where you ignored a key point, but let's not get derailed further on this.

I don't agree. I think it's more to do with your selective reading of the evidence offered.

Maybe you can start showing where I've selectively read the evidence as opposed to this awfully tired song and dance?