Skip to Main Content
ext_39051 (
telemann.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
talkpolitics
2014-07-13 09:33 pm (UTC)
no subject
It's okay that you missed that.
Says the guy who doesn't get the implications that attending an Occupy march would rules out any influence by far right ideology or rhetoric cf the OP
What's reductive is assuming Bundy = right, but whatever works for you.
Well, that's not an example of reductive, since I'm not selectively ignoring anything as you have.
Based on the evidence presented, yes.
*Selective evidence and selective reading.
Do you have anything to add to this at all at this point?
Yes, this comment :-)
(
282 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
(will be screened if not validated)
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
Says the guy who doesn't get the implications that attending an Occupy march would rules out any influence by far right ideology or rhetoric cf the OP
What's reductive is assuming Bundy = right, but whatever works for you.
Well, that's not an example of reductive, since I'm not selectively ignoring anything as you have.
Based on the evidence presented, yes.
*Selective evidence and selective reading.
Do you have anything to add to this at all at this point?
Yes, this comment :-)