ext_36450 ([identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics2009-08-13 02:55 pm
Entry tags:

This is when you know reform is needed:

The Economist praises the Swedish health care system over the American on issues of incentives.

Article linked here:

http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13899647

Also....an image worth keeping in mind for defenders of the broken system:



Now, there's something wrong with this picture. See if you can tell me what it is.....

X-posted from my own LJ.

[identity profile] redheadrat.livejournal.com 2009-08-13 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
you say: I cough - you get a checkup (usually after the people with more serious conditions are taken care of, but they cannot throw you out).

Still the care is there.

Yes, and I blame my government for legislating in a way that the costs to the taxpayers have exploded without little real benefit to taxpayers.

[identity profile] chessdev.livejournal.com 2009-08-14 05:02 am (UTC)(link)
If your life is not in distress, actually they dont have to treat every cough and sneeze.

A hospital is only responsible for stabalizing you, and giving a cursory exam (as in basic of basic to ensure you're not in distress) to ensure they weren't negligent -- not for *having* to treat every cough and sneeze.