Anarchists, AKA the people you seem to be addressing, believe that social order itself is a corrupting influence, inherently oppressive, and in their purest form seek to abolish all forms of organized hierarchy. (Of course now that I've said this montecristo will probably swoop in on a chandelier to correct me.)
Libertarians on the other hand hold that while social order is necessary for a functioning society, concentrations of power will attract the corrupt and power hungry. As such they advocate decentralization rather than abolition.
To put this in terms that might actually stick. You seem to be using "chaotic neutral" arguments on a "lawful neutral" person and then getting annoyed when that person fails to respond in the way you expected.
no subject
Anarchists, AKA the people you seem to be addressing, believe that social order itself is a corrupting influence, inherently oppressive, and in their purest form seek to abolish all forms of organized hierarchy. (Of course now that I've said this montecristo will probably swoop in on a chandelier to correct me.)
Libertarians on the other hand hold that while social order is necessary for a functioning society, concentrations of power will attract the corrupt and power hungry. As such they advocate decentralization rather than abolition.
To put this in terms that might actually stick. You seem to be using "chaotic neutral" arguments on a "lawful neutral" person and then getting annoyed when that person fails to respond in the way you expected.