http://rowsdowerisms.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] rowsdowerisms.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2013-10-17 09:16 pm (UTC)

I'm with everything you're saying except, "Whatever the government borrows to spend into the economy, represents, basically, a subsidy to businesses and rich folk, which is why we will always have deficits, because deficits represent a wealth transfer to the 1 percent."

At 0% or negative real interest rates, how is this the case? At best, isn't it a wash for the wealthy and an influx of cash for the proles?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting