If your data can be used to support conclusions other than your own that's a feature rather than a bug and you have decide which you value more, scientific truth or your political objectives. The majority of AGW advocates have come down on the side of the later.

It becomes political because the misrepresentation of science has real-life impacts on real-life people because of our political process.

Your assertion apply just as much to "your side" as it does "mine".

You didn't really think all those billions of dollars being funneled in to "cap and trade" were about saving the world did you? If so I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you.