ext_360878 ([identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2013-09-08 03:16 pm (UTC)

I don't think it's a matter of nuance at all.

"The term political radicalism (or simply, in political science, radicalism) denotes political principles focused on altering social structures through revolutionary means and changing value systems in fundamental ways."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_radicalism

Or, as I suspect, in case you don't trust Wikipedia as a source, you may use this:

"Favoring or effecting fundamental or revolutionary changes in current practices, conditions, or institutions"
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/radical

If you are so willing to join some conservative extremists in the belief that conserving energy and putting control on drugs are "radical", more power to you. Just don't attribute this delusion to some sort of incomprehension on my part.

eliminating the Fed and Central Bank system
Removing the requirement of compulsory education

Now you might be getting somewhere. Except, now you'll have to demonstrate that this proposal is "workable". Then your utter concern about my insatiability might be put to rest. ;-)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting