ext_90803 ([identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2013-09-09 12:20 am (UTC)

No, I don't. Without subsidies and policies aimed at increasing extraction, oil's historic price would be higher.

Sadly, those supposed subsidies? They don't exist (http://energycommerce.house.gov/sites/republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/files/Hearings/EP/20120913/HHRG-112-IF03-WState-HammH-20120913.pdf), or, to be clearer, aren't special to the oil sector (http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidblackmon/2013/01/02/oil-gas-tax-provisions-are-not-subsidies-for-big-oil/), at least not in the United States. Imagine if we did do what you thin, instead of taxing it on both ends and pushing hard not to expand drilling!

FTFY again. Needs are not wants.

Agreed. We need oil. The market knows how to address its needs better than the government does.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting