Skip to Main Content
ext_39544 (
wight1984.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
talkpolitics
2013-06-30 09:40 pm (UTC)
no subject
Wouldn't it be easier and better to just have that as the legal default?
Why have it as an invoked right when you could have it as a passive right that always belongs to you?
Re-affirming through speech is great and everything, but I wouldn't want that to be a requirement of having a right.
(
51 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
(will be screened if not validated)
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
Why have it as an invoked right when you could have it as a passive right that always belongs to you?
Re-affirming through speech is great and everything, but I wouldn't want that to be a requirement of having a right.