http://a-new-machine.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2013-06-26 02:13 am (UTC)

SD v. Dole is different. First, the state could've chosen to go without that money, which is a fair choice, according to SCOTUS. Congress can't "tak[e] absolute control and [tell] states" what to do, or how to do it. See New York v. United States. That's a general principle. However, the VRA is quite different, because the Fifteenth Amendment specifically empowers Congress to enforce the Amendment on the states.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting