ext_114329 ([identity profile] malasadas.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2013-06-25 05:49 pm (UTC)

That still comes off as legislating. Congress asked that question in 2006 and compiled 15,000 pages of documents in evidence for renewal. SCOTUS said section 5 is Constitutional, meaning it IS okay to require some jurisdictions to face higher levels of scrutiny than others. But then they said section 4 is unconstitutional essentially because it is old.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting