ext_114329 ([identity profile] malasadas.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2013-06-25 03:34 pm (UTC)

Because the court did not rule the VRA unconstitutional in its totality. It declared the system of determining who was under tighter federal scrutiny outdated and invited Congress to revisit it -- when they had 7 years prior and reauthorizedit by 90% margins.

Seems the very definition of legislating from the bench.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting