Good. But in the very next thread you assert (http://talk-politics.livejournal.com/1721694.html?thread=137000798#t137004894) that people shouldn't be allowed to own snipers. So with half your mouth you're arguing that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, while with the other half you're asserting that the right of the people to keep and bear some arms should be infringed.
no subject
Have you been trying to confuse me, mhmmm?