http://luzribeiro.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2013-06-13 03:32 pm (UTC)

As far as tanks are concerned, I would say no, not at all.

What about RPGs? Rocket launchers? Katyusha? Hand grenade? Snipers? Hey, what about predator drones? Why can't you have one of your own? They've been all around the place lately.

Where is the line? Is there a line at all? The Constitution says "arms". What does that mean? The arms that existed in the 18th century? Or does it extend to the 21st century? Why not ballistic missiles, then?
(206 comments)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of people who comment anonymously.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.