As far as tanks are concerned, I would say no, not at all.
How should I interpret it? You "would say"? Did you toss a coin to define what you "would say" about tanks?
Dude, there should be a reliable criterion for such a distinction. Otherwise we'd end up with a collection of arbitrary positions that have no foundation in legal practice.
My point is that as times evolve, so should legislation. If it doesn't things start to become rather complicated.
Also your unwillingness to address any of my points has been noted. Although that's kind of disappointing, fair enough, I guess.
no subject
How should I interpret it? You "would say"? Did you toss a coin to define what you "would say" about tanks?
Dude, there should be a reliable criterion for such a distinction. Otherwise we'd end up with a collection of arbitrary positions that have no foundation in legal practice.
My point is that as times evolve, so should legislation. If it doesn't things start to become rather complicated.
Also your unwillingness to address any of my points has been noted. Although that's kind of disappointing, fair enough, I guess.