it seems perfectly clear to me after reading it that there is no issue here that risks the upheaval of the justice system, as your first paragraph suggests.
its a good ruling, technically**; it simply sucks that federal law is so shitty on drug policy.
(makes me think of futurama: 'you are technically correct bureaucrat Hermes, the best kind of correct!)
no subject
did you read the entire (majority) decision?
it seems perfectly clear to me after reading it that there is no issue here that risks the upheaval of the justice system, as your first paragraph suggests.
its a good ruling, technically**; it simply sucks that federal law is so shitty on drug policy.
(makes me think of futurama: 'you are technically correct bureaucrat Hermes, the best kind of correct!)