ext_216150 ([identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2009-07-20 05:53 pm (UTC)

Sort of.

Yes, the simplest version of marriage is a social contract, but even at that level, there are commitments made, enforced by families, which leads to warring families in the case of breach.

Hardly a model one should hold up as exemplary, worthy of returning to, and therefore irrelevant.

We don't live in a tribal society, and won't unless there's some kind of major calamity, like zombies or nuclear war or if you market fundamentalists somehow take charge and break capitalism completely.


Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting