Well, hey, buddy, find me some scholars or judges who think that churches and for-profit institutions should receive equivalent protections under the free exercise clause, and I'll stop treating you like the crank in the garage who thinks he's discovered cold fusion.

Oh - and what's this? You're avoiding any substantive response again? And here I thought you might be able to formulate an argument to support your position or to contradict mine. Whoops! How did I get that idea?