the implications might be more than he imagined and not in a good way.
And the subsequent suffering would be sweet irony....yeah, I got it the first time.
A solo artist sings and has a right to sing, but the effect of what is being offered above would in essence say that the moment you join your voice with others under a paper charter, that right disappears and the group of people as a whole can be made to shut up. Legally. Because of a stupid piece of paper whose primary purpose is to define the legal structure of the group, not affect the rights of the people within the group to speak together.
That is a bit more substance than "you'll be sorry!"
a way to end the thread
It didn't end the thread. It devolved into this "explain" thread.
no subject
And the subsequent suffering would be sweet irony....yeah, I got it the first time.
A solo artist sings and has a right to sing, but the effect of what is being offered above would in essence say that the moment you join your voice with others under a paper charter, that right disappears and the group of people as a whole can be made to shut up. Legally. Because of a stupid piece of paper whose primary purpose is to define the legal structure of the group, not affect the rights of the people within the group to speak together.
That is a bit more substance than "you'll be sorry!"
a way to end the thread
It didn't end the thread. It devolved into this "explain" thread.