ext_92519 ([identity profile] dexeron.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2012-11-29 04:18 pm (UTC)

It seems to me like that would be a fiscally responsible position to take: the returns in terms of savings on entitlements later could be much greater than the minimal outlay required to provide the pills. Seems like a great savings in government spending! I'd assume fiscal conservatives would be all in favor of it, right? ;)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting