http://hikarugenji.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] hikarugenji.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2012-11-29 12:15 am (UTC)

No, because the health care issue is not that direct. Tyndale is being required to subsidize health insurance that some employees might choose to use for contraception. They're not being required to directly give contraceptives to their employees. There's a difference.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting