ext_97971 (
enders-shadow.livejournal.com) wrote in
talkpolitics2012-03-17 08:20 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Honestly: the minimum wage does need to go up
This post got me thinking.
I am firmly in favor of:
A) A higher minimum wage in the whole US, and my home state of NY
B) Honesty in politics
While the OP I linked to is not exactly dishonest, it's not exactly honest either.
And this is not to put flak upon the poster there, but it's an example of political rhetoric that is used to leverage one side of a conversation, ignoring nuance.
the graphic in the linked to OP:
1) Doesn't seem to take into account state laws that raise min wage over fed laws
2) Doesn't take into account the vast difference in housing throughout a state
My objection is more with 2 than 1. 1 is easy to take care of, but 2 is not easy.
New York City is WAYYYY more expensive than Rochester or Buffalo, NY; or a large number of other places within the state I could name. Yet, this graphic gives us a number, presumably an average. But that average is way skewed. But how else should they do it? Give us on graphic for NYC and another for the rest of NY State? That wouldn't work either, because then you'd need to break it down for other cities and so on. So what do we do?
We must talk about things in the big picture without getting bogged down in details, otherwise we will have to talk for eons before we can understand what needs to be done. So while I agree that the min wage needs to go up, across the US, I have a problem with the info-graphics created to support that argument. They lack nuance, and as such, are deceiving. Even if they don't mean to be, and are honestly doing the best they can to compile and sort the data, the inevitability of misleading data is going to doom us all.
That said.
Happy saint patty's day.
Was I drunk when I wrote this? You decide.
I am firmly in favor of:
A) A higher minimum wage in the whole US, and my home state of NY
B) Honesty in politics
While the OP I linked to is not exactly dishonest, it's not exactly honest either.
And this is not to put flak upon the poster there, but it's an example of political rhetoric that is used to leverage one side of a conversation, ignoring nuance.
the graphic in the linked to OP:
1) Doesn't seem to take into account state laws that raise min wage over fed laws
2) Doesn't take into account the vast difference in housing throughout a state
My objection is more with 2 than 1. 1 is easy to take care of, but 2 is not easy.
New York City is WAYYYY more expensive than Rochester or Buffalo, NY; or a large number of other places within the state I could name. Yet, this graphic gives us a number, presumably an average. But that average is way skewed. But how else should they do it? Give us on graphic for NYC and another for the rest of NY State? That wouldn't work either, because then you'd need to break it down for other cities and so on. So what do we do?
We must talk about things in the big picture without getting bogged down in details, otherwise we will have to talk for eons before we can understand what needs to be done. So while I agree that the min wage needs to go up, across the US, I have a problem with the info-graphics created to support that argument. They lack nuance, and as such, are deceiving. Even if they don't mean to be, and are honestly doing the best they can to compile and sort the data, the inevitability of misleading data is going to doom us all.
That said.
Happy saint patty's day.
Was I drunk when I wrote this? You decide.
no subject
1968 minimum wage would be $10.47 if adjusted for inflation.
We're paying less and less for people to do work, but expecting productivity to go up.
But hey who needs to increase minimum wage? It might make my 8 dollar beer cost $0.02 more.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
give the mom and pop place a break heh!
no subject
no subject
huh?
no subject
It probably would have been more effective after one of many other comments.
no subject
no subject
no subject
uh, yeah!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's not?
no subject
It's sorta a single example though.
But, do you really think beer at a bar is priced by it's cost to the business?
It's incredible mark-up, and paying the workers involved in producing and selling it a slightly higher wage isn't gonna reduce that mark-up enough to matter.
Also, bartenders usually make the money from tips, not from min wage, even though they count as min wage workers. I would also wonder how many beer breweries pay their workers min wage (i have no idea, but i'd be surprised it it was a high min-wage field)
no subject
I am honestly torn on the whole minimum wage/living wage debate, since in my business one pays prevailing wage, which being a trade is more than double.
The last time this was the subject of debate I used an example of how raising of the minimum wage CAN hurt a small business (actually several iirc) For years waitresses and bartenders were allowed to be paid a base that was below minimum wage (In Los Angeles) because their tips assured them of an actual wage that was much more. The City Council in it's finite wisdom decided they all had to be paid minimum wage as a base. Some small places couldn't handle it and had to lay people off, which of course affected their business. Now you stated up there (somewhere) that if a business can't afford to pay minimum wage and stay in business they shouldn't (or something like that). Let's explore this a moment: Many small eating places (for example) are family owned and mostly operated. Very few of them make people rich. Most do pay the bills and allow for a comfortable life (or else they do go out of business) but the profit margins are slim. Say I make approx $800 a week from my little diner (roughly 40K a year.....for putting in 60+ hours a week, doing something I enjoy, and has been in the family for generations...that's not as unusual as it may sound) and the gov't tells me I have to now pay my employees an extra 2.50 an hour, it doesn't take very many to make say 100 hours a week (two full time one 1/2 time) to take me down to $550 a week clear. Trust me it's a whole lot of work, working in and running a business for those kind of wages. The interesting thing is that the employees were making almost $12 an hour with tips instead of the 7.50 (example) that was minimum wage, even tho their base was $5. So while the business owner has a number of options all of them (that I see) end up costing the employees in the long run.....which is generally what happens when the gov't tries to help ;)
no subject
You know about the changes YEARS in advance, the changes are usually very small (maybe 30 cents at a time), and much of the time inflation absorbs most of the costs.
Where's an example that takes those facts into account? Aren't you the one being hyperbolic with that highly unrealistic scenario?
no subject
The city of Santa Monica has passed a "living wage law" that gave those affected a relatively short implimendation period.
L.A. was working on a similar law, which again would only affect singled out businesses. (I don't know what ever happened since I moved out of L.A. County a long time ago)..
In theory I wouldn't argue against a minimum or living wage law (altho I'm personally in favor of the idea of a prevailing wage, but that can be nebulous) however in RL it can be very difficult to impliment FAIRLY.
Several points: Most (that I know of) minimum wage jobs are entry level jobs. If I understood all the numbers bounced around thru this post 3% of people working minimum wage support families, now here is where it gets tricky, assuming that the majority aren't people that have lost their jobs and aren't marking time (since unemployment will pay more than you can get on minimum wage if you have been working at a substancial job) I find it difficult to believe that someone who is content with a minimum wage job would start a family...that being said I do know families who have bought homes with 3-4 members all working minimum or slightly more, jobs. (That takes in other factors that could come off xenophobic, and I don't want to side track at the moment). And having run two businesses, I can see how a mandantory pay raise (even only) 30cents an hour can make a big enough difference in the bottom line as to make it not worth it. I could leave the family business right now and generate a larger bottom line than I am right now (with less effort) however if the economy gets better I would be sorry, not to mention I am too close to retiring :D
no subject
It is way higher than 3% who are supporting families. I'll go find you a citation.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject