http://mrbogey.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2012-03-15 12:19 am (UTC)

I honestly have no clue where you're getting anything from.

I'm reading plain English from the bill and from sites that sum it up and agree with me and you're... just making claims.

The current bill doesn't change much as they still had religious exemptions in the past.

'So it's a "mandate" in the sense that its mandatory, except if you don't want to. '

And for that to kick in you needed to file the objection. Otherwise, it's still an existing mandate.


You're claiming it wasn't a mandate yet here's a site saying it was a mandate since 2002 and I cited language in the bill that supports the assertion that it's a mandate. But you're saying there's no mandate because??

If you're just fucking with me, let me know so I can just go do something else.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting