He has no legislative influence is a reason he's like Godzilla in Tokyo when interpreting the constitution? That's totally irrelevant unless you're saying he lacks influence because of his opinion of constitutional interpretation. In fact, in the House, it's more like again, he's mostly alone in being an actual Republican. The notion that in this modern day and age, Ron Paul is really a libertarian, only demonstrates how as time progresses, the people accept ignorance more. What is this bandwagon I see wanting to come into explicit existence?