![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Mostly, I just want an excuse to post a brutally cool video:
However, it does raise a few interesting questions -- the octopus under study doesn't merely make use of the coconut shell as a hermit crab uses another shell for shelter. The octopus actually selects shells, cleans them out and then carries them with them in anticipation of an abstract need for protection from a not yet present threat.
Pretty damned sophisticated behavior and likely learned recently rather than programmed into instinct.
So a few questions:
1) Is this definite indication of sentience and intelligence?
2) What IS intelligence in the sense that we use it to describe ourselves as unique animals?
3) Does the existence of an invertebrate that demonstrates problem solving intelligence complicate our general relationship with animals?
Amendment: Question 3A: Does the recognition of problem-solving intelligence that thinks abstractly about time and space in another species give additional creedence to the arguments of the animal rights movement?
And for the science fiction fans in the audience:
What are the chances that human beings may some day be "out evolved" by another species of animal?
Bonus question: Am I in big karmic trouble for my love of takoyaki?
However, it does raise a few interesting questions -- the octopus under study doesn't merely make use of the coconut shell as a hermit crab uses another shell for shelter. The octopus actually selects shells, cleans them out and then carries them with them in anticipation of an abstract need for protection from a not yet present threat.
Pretty damned sophisticated behavior and likely learned recently rather than programmed into instinct.
So a few questions:
1) Is this definite indication of sentience and intelligence?
2) What IS intelligence in the sense that we use it to describe ourselves as unique animals?
3) Does the existence of an invertebrate that demonstrates problem solving intelligence complicate our general relationship with animals?
Amendment: Question 3A: Does the recognition of problem-solving intelligence that thinks abstractly about time and space in another species give additional creedence to the arguments of the animal rights movement?
And for the science fiction fans in the audience:
What are the chances that human beings may some day be "out evolved" by another species of animal?
Bonus question: Am I in big karmic trouble for my love of takoyaki?
(no subject)
Date: 15/12/09 18:52 (UTC)But don't worry, we're descended from apes, we'll go to war with an exterminate any animal that starts getting too smart long before it poses a threat.
(no subject)
Date: 15/12/09 18:54 (UTC)Odds are this is learned which means some really smart ass octopus figured this out first.
(no subject)
Date: 15/12/09 19:35 (UTC)Octopi have always hidden in crevices and cracks. They've always grabbed things randomly with their tentacles. You just don't see octopi around lightweight covers very often. The octopi looks like it did as they always do: try to climb into a dark hiding place, it just so happens this dark hiding place isn't attached to anything.
You know squid will take things out of pockets if they think it might be shiny or edible.
The thing is, I want to point out that I think the distinction between animals using tools and this behavior is not a very large one at all. I don't think it's actually as impressive an indicator as people try to make it out to be. All sorts of animals 'use tools', just in a much less sophisticated way than we'd notice.
The cat craps in a litterbox and rakes the sand, it's manipulating its environment for its own benefit with something artificial. Birds build nests as shelters, if they could figure out how to carry the nests around to shelter them while flying they probably would. They carry sticks around with the purpose of having protection at a later time.
I'm just not convinced that this is any more sophisticated behavior than normal octopi behavior without more information.
(no subject)
Date: 15/12/09 19:08 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/12/09 19:35 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/12/09 20:10 (UTC)/pedant hat off.
(no subject)
Date: 15/12/09 22:16 (UTC)That makes me think that they learned it. Now they may have some wiring to seek defense, but that does not make the whole thing instinctual any more a general desire for food makes any attempt to get that instinctual.
(no subject)
Date: 16/12/09 22:31 (UTC)In the same way, the octopus is doing what it knows to do with anything that looks like that. It's not recognizing this as a new different thing and doing new and different things with it.
(no subject)
Date: 16/12/09 22:45 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 17/12/09 07:43 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 17/12/09 15:55 (UTC)