[identity profile] debunkgpolitics.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Originally posted by [livejournal.com profile] debunkgpolitics at Former NSA Advisor and U.N. Ambassador Rice on Charges of Spying on the Trump Campaign
The April 4, 2017 interview with Ms. Rice https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpjN4iEz9Ooraised additional questions that would prove or disprove claims that she assisted in spying on the Trump Campaign.
In the beginning, she gave a fictional example of when unmaking a name would be necessary. Plus, Ms. Rice said that sometimes unmasking a name is sometimes okay (~5:35). Both points are sensible, as identifying the American can help officials better assess whether there is a serious threat. She later said that the White House would/could not have directed intelligence agencies to spy on political opponents (~11:14).
Another revealing point Ms. Rice made is that she, along with any other NSA Advisor, receives information based on what the intelligence community (IC) considers important (~11:58). Thus, the NSA Advisor is subject to the discretion of other intelligence officials, who have their own standard process of whether to specifically identify an American (~6:23).
Ms. Rice also said that possible Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election was revealed about six months ago.
Ms. Rice is correct in that interference in any U.S. Presidential election is a grave concern for the IC. Thus, the IC had every reason to unmask the name of an American conversing with Russian to properly investigate the matter. Clearly, the IC found identifying Gen. Mike Flynn necessary.
The pertinent questions are:
1. Did she request reports concerning possible Russian interference in the election?
2. Why would anyone reveal Gen. Flynn to the public rather than keep is identity internal?
3. How long did the IC monitor Gen. Flynn? Interfering with an election and investigating a threat to national security takes a while.
4. How much of the monitoring did Ms. Rice follow? Surely, she would have been regularly provided reports of an attempt to interfere with a national election.

(no subject)

Date: 16/4/17 18:30 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nairiporter.livejournal.com
Ms. Rice is correct in that interference in any U.S. Presidential election is a grave concern for the IC

But is it a crime?

(no subject)

Date: 24/4/17 06:48 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nairiporter.livejournal.com
So what should be done about it? If Russia tilted the result of the US presidential election, what can/should be done now?

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.
A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods



Migration Policy


"Are the dreamers still here? Do we still have Obamacare? Are we still technically in the Paris Climate Accord? Are there still transsexuals in the military? Still no wall? Abortion still legal? If you answered yes to all of these questions - ask your doctor if toning down the outrage is right for you."

October 2017

2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22