![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
The Economist praises the Swedish health care system over the American on issues of incentives.
Article linked here:
http://www.economist.com/world/unitedsta tes/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13899647
Also....an image worth keeping in mind for defenders of the broken system:

Now, there's something wrong with this picture. See if you can tell me what it is.....
X-posted from my own LJ.
Article linked here:
http://www.economist.com/world/unitedsta
Also....an image worth keeping in mind for defenders of the broken system:

Now, there's something wrong with this picture. See if you can tell me what it is.....
X-posted from my own LJ.
(no subject)
Date: 13/8/09 20:22 (UTC)also did you notice how little medicaid pays for regular check-up, anyone can afford that, they just need to explain to doc their situation
PS: In Philly there are free clinics as well.
(no subject)
Date: 13/8/09 20:32 (UTC)And you, the tax payer, and I the tax payer, pay for it anyway.
(no subject)
Date: 13/8/09 20:35 (UTC)Still the care is there.
Yes, and I blame my government for legislating in a way that the costs to the taxpayers have exploded without little real benefit to taxpayers.
(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 05:02 (UTC)A hospital is only responsible for stabalizing you, and giving a cursory exam (as in basic of basic to ensure you're not in distress) to ensure they weren't negligent -- not for *having* to treat every cough and sneeze.