http://cheezyfish.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] cheezyfish.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2013-06-03 07:59 pm (UTC)

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57434757-504083/fla-woman-marissa-alexander-gets-20-years-for-warning-shot-did-she-stand-her-ground/ (http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57434757-504083/fla-woman-marissa-alexander-gets-20-years-for-warning-shot-did-she-stand-her-ground/)

This women got 20 years for a warning shot. She probably wishes she instead chose to shoot him in the face. Either way, what you are suggesting actually makes using a gun on a human being easier. The law says, if you are going to use a gun for defensive purposes, you need to fear for your life. If you make shooting people in the leg acceptable, or even preferred, what ends up happening is dramatically increasing the scenarios in which discharging a gun is okay, and as a additional side effect, a whole lot of people will end up getting murdered because a gun wound in the leg didn't stop a violent criminal.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting