abomvubuso: (Johnny Bravo)
[personal profile] abomvubuso posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Those who are hyped up about tonight's Game of Thrones Season VII debut would know what the above reference is about. It's from a story that Tyrion the imp told his brother while being in a cell, about a dim-witted cousin whose only occupation was to crush little beetles with a stone just because he could: "Khu! Khu! Khuuu!" the stone went down, and the poor little beetles would die by the scores.

There was no reason to it, no intention behind it, no purpose. Just like in real life, the strong would crush the weak just because he could.


That's the real magic of this show, it's not so much about the damn dragons and zombies, and not even about the blood and titties. It tells a story of our real world, our real life, in a more fantasy-like way.

And a new portion of blood, tits and intrigues is coming up in the next couple of months or so. And we're of course excited about it. Because each of us can recognise part of themselves in some of the characters, or indeed, in entire segments of the populace of George RR Martin's fantasy world called Westeros. Game of Thrones is the perfect show for the modern age. Its characters have now become part of the public myth, and not just because they're multi-faceted and diverse, their ethics ambiguous and their intentions and rationales recognisable and relatable - it's the entire social, historical and political setting of the series that makes us poise and think about ourselves for a bit.

That, and all the tits of course.

As one CNN article from a few years ago said, "A fire-breathing dragon has never vaporized a senator giving a pompous speech on C-SPAN. No candidate has ever poisoned a rival at his wedding reception, and no "white walker" zombie has ever dragged a screaming climate change skeptic away. Yet anyone who thinks HBO's popular "Game of Thrones" is just about kings and castles misses how much the show reflects contemporary America". It reflects the world, I'd add. Because:

- Only elites can play the game
- It's a man's world
- Political paralysis jeopardizes the future
- A nation lives beyond its means
- Race still matters

And many other reasons.

Anyway. Apart from the most obvious favourites like Tyrion, Jon and Daenerys, whom will you really be rooting for?

(no subject)

Date: 17/7/17 06:00 (UTC)
asthfghl: (Къде съм аз къде сте вий!)
From: [personal profile] asthfghl
Bronn is my fave dude. Always fun to watch him.

(no subject)

Date: 17/7/17 08:54 (UTC)
fridi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] fridi
Would I be too evil if I rooted for the Night King?

(no subject)

Date: 17/7/17 13:42 (UTC)
dreamville_bg: (Default)
From: [personal profile] dreamville_bg
Not necessarily.

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/17 14:44 (UTC)
From: [personal profile] mikeyxw
It'd be plenty evil, but given GRRM, you'd probably be backing the winning side which is always the wise move.

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/17 16:06 (UTC)
fridi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] fridi
Hey, the Others (the whitewalkers) are said to be symbolizing the forces of nature. There's nothing evil about rooting for nature. WHY DO YOU HATE NATURE!??

(no subject)

Date: 20/7/17 15:33 (UTC)
asthfghl: (Коста Баничаров)
From: [personal profile] asthfghl
Well, they are a weapon that went out of control. They rather symbolize nukes if you ask me.

(no subject)

Date: 17/7/17 13:42 (UTC)
mahnmut: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mahnmut
Geopolitics is also governed by the same Khuu-khuu principle, by the way.

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/17 08:04 (UTC)
airiefairie: (Default)
From: [personal profile] airiefairie
What isn't.

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/17 01:38 (UTC)
policraticus: (Default)
From: [personal profile] policraticus
whom will you really be rooting for?

The only decent man in Westeros: Sir Davos Seaworth.

Also, Samwell Tarly.

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/17 08:05 (UTC)
airiefairie: (Default)
From: [personal profile] airiefairie
Missandei/Greyworm.
Edited Date: 18/7/17 08:05 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/17 08:06 (UTC)
luzribeiro: (Holycow)
From: [personal profile] luzribeiro
Ned Stark is gonna win the Iron Throne!

OH WAIT.....

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/17 14:53 (UTC)
From: [personal profile] mikeyxw
I always find myself rooting for Pod. I'm sure he's going to continue to do great things in a completely hapless way, kind of like a John McClane without the star power. To me, the Hound is the most interesting character but then I've always liked a good anti-hero.

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/17 21:59 (UTC)
policraticus: (Default)
From: [personal profile] policraticus
I think the Hound and Jamie Lannister have the most complicated character arcs in the series. I would be happy to see them each find some peace, but I'm betting they don't find it.

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/17 22:17 (UTC)
From: [personal profile] mikeyxw
They're both characters who were playing a role that wasn't who they really were. The psychopathic killer who was a hero at heart and the "Man Without Honor" who has more integrity than most of the other heads of the great houses of Westeros.

Anyhow, peace for any extended periods isn't something that really fits into the story, so yeah, you're probably right.

Credits & Style Info


Talk Politics.
A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

https://v.dreamwidth.org/10920353/2729172

MONTHLY TOPIC:

Conflict of Interest


DAILY QUOTE:

It's said that "If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention." Sadly most people think being outraged is the point, and the paying attention part is optional.
(garote)

July 2017

M T W T F S S
      1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24252627282930
31